Southlanders For Embryos protest too much
I mean seriously, when you have to issue a press release entirely to say “we met to discuss our options and pinky-sweared each other that we won’t shoot anyone” you may like to consider the company your movement is keeping.
Meanwhile, I will continue to question the non-violence principles of an organisation which claims to “[respect] the life and human rights of all people born and unborn” which nevertheless continues to treat women like walking incubators.
Note that “Silent Witness” paragraph snuck in the middle there? I doubt they’re talking about classic BBC crime drama. Because Jesus was all about glaring at women in need of medical care from the sidewalk and waving faked dead baby pictures at them.
Ideologically Impure 
I’m not religious, but I remember the story of Jesus throwing the whores out of the Temple, which wouldn’t be considered very PC these days, lol. He wasn’t afraid to get tough when needed.
Feminists like you still want to pretend its not an innocent, defenseless human being that is violently butuchered in an abortion. That explains your self righteous, hypocritical screeching at the sporadic violence used by a few extremists while you fervently cheer lead the industrial scale elimination of unborn babies.
K_P! Welcome to Ideologically Impure. I see you’ve brought your complete lack of relationship with the truth with you – it was moneylenders, douchefuck.
And if you’d ever bothered to read a single thing I’ve written about abortion, you’d know I have *no* problem acknowledging a foetus is human. I just don’t believe it should get special rights – and the right to commandeer another person’s body is one *no one* has.
I know YOU want to pretend you’re some ace fighter in the battle against evil bitches who won’t acknowledge the awesomeness of your pee-pee, but that’s your problem.
“it was moneylenders”
I said I wasn’t religious, didn’t I?
Anyway, same thing – whores worshiping Mammon. Take a look at Wall St if you don’t believe me.
“the right to commandeer another person’s body is one *no one* has.”
That’s the ‘unconscious violinist’ argument which has been knocked down.
“…who won’t acknowledge the awesomeness of your pee-pee”
They old envy thing popping up again there, QofT.
You keep making these statements which simply aren’t true, k_p. “Knocked down” where, and by whom, and do you even know what you’re talking about?
References to Freud are a mite more intellectual than I would’ve given you credit for, so I’ll assume you picked that up from one of the anti-feminist blogs you so frequently copy-paste from.
“Feminists like you still want to pretend its not an innocent, defenseless human being that is violently butuchered in an abortion.”
Citation needed.
“while you fervently cheer lead the industrial scale elimination of unborn babies.”
Citation needed.
“That’s the ‘unconscious violinist’ argument which has been knocked down.”
Citation needed.
QoT, you never told me you were leading the industrial scale elimination of unborn babies! How do you find the time, my dear? I’m impressed!
Our dark lord, Aborto-Satan, has granted me magical time-dilation powers where the ceaseless slaughter of innocent souls is concerned.
“you were leading”
It was ‘cheer leading’, cupcake. Big difference but that doesn’t stop you twisting it of course, after all you need to do an awful lot of that in order to maintain the mind game that it isn’t a human life you desire to exterminate.
The clumsy, repetitive sarcasm employed is another symptom of your defensiveness and fear.
Oh sorry, your incoherent blather made it difficult to work out what you were actually trying to say. For the record, cupcake, cheerlead is actually one word.
And bang-up job on pretending you know the first thing about me, honey. As someone who cannot have children, who literally cries herself to sleep every night over that fact, yeah, I’m obviously for the wanton murder of babies amirite?
Also, LOL at “defensiveness and fear”. Bless.
But keep on keeping on with the histronics, the tone argument, and the douchesplainin’. It’s doing a bang-up job of getting your point across.
I’m not surprised at your demonstrated ignorance of the ‘comatose violinist’ example, its ‘Ethics 101: The Abortion Debate’.
After all you describe your own content as a ‘sweary rant’, decorate it with lesbian geek porn graphics [ “Go Purple Lightning Gurl!!” LOL ] ,so can’t expect you to show much intellectual depth, just a lot of hormonally driven polemic against your sworn Enemy the Godbots.
Man haters like you and the God Squad are opposite sides of the same coin.
In the unlikely event you finally make this insight, you will realise how foolish is your blind fury at the supposed indifference or ignorance of mainstrain NZ towards abortion access.
Seriously, k_p, I hope you get banned from The Standard more often, this is fucking hilarious. You seriously want to come whinging on my blog and then call other people’s work a “hormonally driven polemic”? Boy, you’ve sure got me there, with my girly hormones ‘n’ shit.
And I didn’t “demonstrate ignorance” of the unconscious violinist argument, I just asked you to establish your assertion that that argument has been “knocked down”.
It’s cool, bro, I totes didn’t think you’d actually come up with the goods. That would involve you having anything to back up your copy-pasted arguments.
The Standard is a good example of why a rejuvenated right under neo liberalism has dominated for a generation plus. Even after the project crashed and burned in Iraq and the GFC, the Left has made no gains. But what else can be expected from a movement that permits rape culture fantasists like yourself QofT amongst its ranks?
“I didn’t “demonstrate ignorance” of the unconscious violinist argument”
Yes you did otherwise you would know it doesn’t hold water.
“your copy-pasted arguments.”
If they are copy pasted why dont you google them and prove it?
It’s you who fail to come up with the goods. Just the usual demonisation of men.
Your self describe ‘sweary rants’ are a good laugh though.
“otherwise you would know it doesn’t hold water”
… and yet you yourself can’t actually explain how. Have they not covered that at Pathetic Troll School yet?
Hey kiwi_prometheus,
Where’s the retort? I’m in dire need of a study distraction that’s dripping with ignorance.
MJ -> “As someone who cannot have children, who literally cries herself to sleep every night over that fact…”
You must really appreciate QofT superb use of sarcasm then – “behold, PROBORTICA, killer of a thousand embryos”.
Well sure, because she’s so obviously serious about that.
If you don’t know what “sarcasm” is, k_p, there’s no harm in saying so. The first step is admitting you have a problem. And my tagline isn’t sarcastic so much as exaggerated for satirical effect. If you don’t understand any of those words either, just speak up.