Good parents who are just doing their best raising horrible children => get investigated for assaulting said children => no further action taken when Police/CYFS are satisfied no abuse taking place?
HORRIBLE PERSECUTION OF INNOCENTS, STATE OVERREACHING ITS BOUNDS.
Random people who may or may not be sex offenders => names published in a sex offender registry accidentally => potentially face actual persecution in the form of mobs, harassment, being chased out of neighbourhoods?
WE MUST KEEP THIS NATION SAFE!!!! WHY DO YOU LOVE CHILD ABUSERS???
Homework: create a mind-map showing what qualities you think the Sensible Sentencing Trust assumes those two groups of people (“good parents” and “random not-actually-convicted-of-anything people who someone thinks is a sex offender”) have, and how to distinguish between them.
Bonus credit: present an internally-consistent explanation of how the Sensible Sentencing Trust can expect our Police and child protection services to crack down on abuse while simultaneously never investigating Good Parents.
The police et al just need to ask the supreme-lord-of-justice Garth McVicar who is guilty and who is innocent (bonus credit?)
Yes! A winner is you! (Or not, because you had to type that HORRIBLE SENTENCE.)