//
you're reading...
Uncategorized

Are you fucking kidding me Naomi Madelin

Unbelievable quote of the day:

Eighty-four per cent of people arrested for family violence are men. Half of all violent crime in New Zealand is family violence. The statistics go on. Perhaps the way to give men a chance is for women to appreciate their own femininity more.

The rationale being, apparently, that women trying to be more masculine are the ones “sending the message” that being manly is better … because violence is an inherent part of manliness (and remember, it’s us nasty unshaven feminists who hate men, right) and what the fuck am I even reading.

Oh, right.  I’m reading an SST article by a freelance writer who starts off acting outraged about something Wikipedia says (unfortunately, said quote cannot be verified by Google), then insists femininity isn’t just about wearing frocks, it’s about how we carry ourselves, and seriously seems to think that women choose to deny their inner need for frills in a complete absence of dominant culture which might, you know, treat men as the default, the norm, the aspirational.

I don’t know where to start, but I know where Naomi Madelin could’ve fucking started:  a basic Google search for some feminism 101 blogging on masculinity and the construction of gender, looking up the notion of high femme or the active and long-standing debate about traditional femininity and feminism, picking up the OED, or, I know, having a fucking clue about something before she churned out an erratic, incoherent attack-piece yet again laying the fault for all the world’s ills on stupid, silly women.

Discussion

8 Responses to “Are you fucking kidding me Naomi Madelin”

  1. Yeah, I saw the article header on Stuff and got out my Rage Helmet in preparation. As usual, my spidey senses were spot on; rage ensued.
    This got me as well:
    “Gay men reclaimed the word ‘gay’. It’s time for women to reclaim the word ‘feminine’.”
    Because, y’know, homosexuality is a social construct too!

    Posted by Scar | November 27, 2011, 9:21 pm
  2. Oh my word.

    Posted by Chally | November 27, 2011, 9:58 pm
  3. Pretty much. I chose to go the outrageous sarcasm route because I just could not even. Un-fucking-believable.

    Posted by Chris Miller | November 27, 2011, 10:21 pm
  4. I got stuck on women-are-responsible-for-male-violence-against-them, I never made it to the construction of gender offensiveness.

    wtf :(

    Posted by Anita | November 28, 2011, 8:10 pm
  5. She STILL hasn’t replied to me on Twitter either.

    Posted by coleytangerina | November 29, 2011, 10:01 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Naomi Madelin: totally *is* fucking kidding us « Ideologically Impure - November 29, 2011

  2. Pingback: Forty-third Down Under Feminists Carnival « A Bee of a Certain Age - December 3, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

QoT on Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 41 other followers